REC.L
Price:
$62.4
Market Cap:
$122.72M
Record plc, through its subsidiaries, provides currency and derivative management services in the United Kingdom, North America, Continental Europe, Australia, and internationally. It offers asset management services; derivatives, such as options, futures, cross-currency, and total-return swaps; fixed income instruments, including bonds and loans; ancillary services including cash and liquidity management, collateral management, and derivatives overlays. The company's clients include asset managers, pension funds, foundations, and other institutional investors. It distributes its products through direct sales, as well as through investment consultants. Record plc was founded in 1983 and is h...[Read more]
Industry
Asset Management
IPO Date
2000-01-04
Stock Exchange
LSE
Ticker
REC.L
According to Record plc’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current PE Ratio is 12.48. This represents a change of 612.41% compared to the average of 1.75 of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical PE Ratio of Record plc over the last ten years is 13.93. The current 12.48 PE Ratio has changed 8.86% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), REC.L's PE Ratio was at its highest in in the December 2012 quarter at 15.30. The PE Ratio was at its lowest in in the March 2020 quarter at 0.07.
Average
13.93
Median
13.12
Minimum
8.15
Maximum
25.44
Discovering the peaks and valleys of Record plc PE Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 212.17%
Maximum Annual PE Ratio = 25.44
Minimum Annual Increase = -47.31%
Minimum Annual PE Ratio = 8.15
Year | PE Ratio | Change |
---|---|---|
2024 | 12.54 | -4.77% |
2023 | 13.17 | -16.21% |
2022 | 15.72 | -38.21% |
2021 | 25.44 | 212.17% |
2020 | 8.15 | -6.18% |
2019 | 8.69 | -47.31% |
2018 | 16.48 | 2.98% |
2017 | 16.01 | 60.14% |
2016 | 9.99 | -23.54% |
2015 | 13.07 | -22.73% |
The current PE Ratio of Record plc (REC.L) is less than than its 3-year, less than than its 5-year, and less than than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
13.81
5-year avg
15.00
10-year avg
13.93
Record plc’s PE Ratio is less than City of London Investment Group PLC (12.71), greater than H&T Group plc (7.15), less than Sylvania Platinum Limited (23.93), greater than Ramsdens Holdings PLC (9.18), greater than Bango plc (-11.58),
Company | PE Ratio | Market cap |
---|---|---|
12.71 | $190.93M | |
7.15 | $157.48M | |
23.93 | $130.80M | |
9.18 | $71.77M | |
-11.58 | $80.67M |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like Record plc using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like Record plc or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the PE Ratio?
How can you use the PE Ratio?
What is Record plc's PE Ratio?
How is the PE Ratio calculated for Record plc (REC.L)?
What is the highest PE Ratio for Record plc (REC.L)?
What is the 3-year average PE Ratio for Record plc (REC.L)?
What is the 5-year average PE Ratio for Record plc (REC.L)?
How does the current PE Ratio for Record plc (REC.L) compare to its historical average?