NUO
Price:
$12.66
Market Cap:
$0
Nuveen Ohio Quality Municipal Income Fund is a closed ended fixed income mutual fund launched by Nuveen Investments, Inc. The fund is co-managed by Nuveen Fund Advisors LLC and Nuveen Asset Management, LLC. It invests in the fixed income markets of Ohio. The fund invests in tax exempt municipal bonds. It employs fundamental analysis, with bottom-up stock picking approach, to create its portfolio. The fund benchmarks the performance of its portfolio against the Standard & Poor's Ohio Municipal Bond Index and Standard & Poor's National Municipal Bond Index. The fund was formerly known as Nuveen Ohio Quality Income Municipal Fund. Nuveen Ohio Quality Municipal Income Fund was formed on October ...[Read more]
Industry
Asset Management - Income
IPO Date
1991-10-18
Stock Exchange
NYSE
Ticker
NUO
According to Nuveen Ohio Quality Municipal Income Fund’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current PE Ratio is -5.28. This represents a change of -Infinity% compared to the average of 0 of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical PE Ratio of Nuveen Ohio Quality Municipal Income Fund over the last ten years is -12.76. The current -5.28 PE Ratio has changed 4.04% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), NUO's PE Ratio was at its highest in in the August 2010 quarter at 0. The PE Ratio was at its lowest in in the August 2010 quarter at 0.
Average
-12.76
Median
10.23
Minimum
-213.86
Maximum
108.93
Discovering the peaks and valleys of Nuveen Ohio Quality Municipal Income Fund PE Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 1.41%
Maximum Annual PE Ratio = 108.93
Minimum Annual Increase = -1447.05%
Minimum Annual PE Ratio = -213.86
Year | PE Ratio | Change |
---|---|---|
2022 | -92.00 | -184.46% |
2021 | 108.93 | 1.41% |
2020 | 7.23 | -64.44% |
2019 | 20.34 | -29.50% |
2018 | 28.86 | -113.49% |
2017 | -213.86 | -1447.05% |
2016 | 15.88 | 97.93% |
2015 | 8.02 | -134.26% |
2014 | -23.41 | -288.20% |
2013 | 12.44 | 97.19% |
The current PE Ratio of Nuveen Ohio Quality Municipal Income Fund (NUO) is less than than its 3-year, less than than its 5-year, and greater than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
8.05
5-year avg
14.67
10-year avg
-12.76
Nuveen Ohio Quality Municipal Income Fund’s PE Ratio is less than BlackRock Virginia Municipal Bond Trust (25.67), less than Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc. (7.75), greater than Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (-78.35), less than Nuveen Core Equity Alpha Fund (5.59), less than Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund (29.59), greater than Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (-22.51), greater than Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (-29.26), greater than Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (-33.76), greater than Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. (-8607.62), less than BNY Mellon Alcentra Global Credit Income 2024 Target Term Fund, Inc. (6.58), less than Nuveen Variable Rate Preferred & Income Fund (7.02), greater than MFS Government Markets Income Trust (-188.47), less than Focus Financial Partners Inc. (27.73), less than BlackRock Income Trust, Inc. (18.56), less than RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (0), less than RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund II, Inc. (0), greater than BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund, Inc. (-52.08), less than Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust (71.55), less than Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund (39.83), less than Insight Select Income Fund (24.85), less than BlackRock Enhanced Government Fund, Inc. (31.41), less than Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust (8.53), less than Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund (14.17), less than Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (7.72),
Company | PE Ratio | Market cap |
---|---|---|
25.67 | $17.72M | |
7.75 | $570.22M | |
-78.35 | $2.46B | |
5.59 | $249.63M | |
29.59 | $2.75B | |
-22.51 | $3.47B | |
-29.26 | $2.82B | |
-33.76 | $1.24B | |
-8607.62 | $1.82B | |
6.58 | $138.61M | |
7.02 | $459.48M | |
-188.47 | $100.62M | |
27.73 | $3.50B | |
18.56 | $249.94M | |
0 | $96.00M | |
0 | $132.15M | |
-52.08 | $635.08M | |
71.55 | $286.02M | |
39.83 | $627.19M | |
24.85 | $184.48M | |
31.41 | $37.16M | |
8.53 | $266.40M | |
14.17 | $157.70M | |
7.72 | $84.62M |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like Nuveen Ohio Quality Municipal Income Fund using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like Nuveen Ohio Quality Municipal Income Fund or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the PE Ratio?
How can you use the PE Ratio?
What is Nuveen Ohio Quality Municipal Income Fund's PE Ratio?
How is the PE Ratio calculated for Nuveen Ohio Quality Municipal Income Fund (NUO)?
What is the highest PE Ratio for Nuveen Ohio Quality Municipal Income Fund (NUO)?
What is the 3-year average PE Ratio for Nuveen Ohio Quality Municipal Income Fund (NUO)?
What is the 5-year average PE Ratio for Nuveen Ohio Quality Municipal Income Fund (NUO)?
How does the current PE Ratio for Nuveen Ohio Quality Municipal Income Fund (NUO) compare to its historical average?