NBM.V
Price:
$0.45
Market Cap:
$52.05M
NEO Battery Materials Ltd., a junior resource company, focuses on the exploration of battery metals in North America. The company holds interests in various mining claims covering 467 hectares located in Golden, British Columbia. It also focuses on developing silicon anodes. The company was formerly known as Pan Andean Minerals Ltd. and changed its name to NEO Battery Materials Ltd. in March 2021. NEO Battery Materials Ltd. was incorporated in 2006 and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.[Read more]
Industry
Industrial Materials
IPO Date
2007-10-25
Stock Exchange
TSXV
Ticker
NBM.V
According to NEO Battery Materials Ltd.’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current PE Ratio is -15.00. This represents a change of 84.41% compared to the average of -8.13 of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical PE Ratio of NEO Battery Materials Ltd. over the last ten years is -6.20. The current -15.00 PE Ratio has changed 24.09% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), NBM.V's PE Ratio was at its highest in in the February 2015 quarter at 0. The PE Ratio was at its lowest in in the November 2021 quarter at -24.48.
Average
-6.20
Median
-4.31
Minimum
-19.55
Maximum
-0.20
Discovering the peaks and valleys of NEO Battery Materials Ltd. PE Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 513.88%
Maximum Annual PE Ratio = -0.20
Minimum Annual Increase = -75.35%
Minimum Annual PE Ratio = -19.55
Year | PE Ratio | Change |
---|---|---|
2024 | -7.92 | -59.49% |
2023 | -19.55 | 44.43% |
2022 | -13.53 | 45.16% |
2021 | -9.32 | 74.77% |
2020 | -5.34 | 513.88% |
2019 | -0.87 | -73.51% |
2018 | -3.28 | 180.30% |
2017 | -1.17 | 475.75% |
2016 | -0.20 | -75.35% |
2015 | -0.82 | -44.30% |
The current PE Ratio of NEO Battery Materials Ltd. (NBM.V) is less than than its 3-year, less than than its 5-year, and less than than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
-13.67
5-year avg
-11.13
10-year avg
-6.20
NEO Battery Materials Ltd.’s PE Ratio is less than Cielo Waste Solutions Corp. (-0.58), less than Vision Lithium Inc. (-2.45), less than Fobi AI Inc. (-1.06), less than Graphene Manufacturing Group Ltd (-7.49), less than Surge Battery Metals Inc. (-7.02),
Company | PE Ratio | Market cap |
---|---|---|
-0.58 | $15.71M | |
-2.45 | $5.25M | |
-1.06 | $8.98M | |
-7.49 | $58.06M | |
-7.02 | $70.75M |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like NEO Battery Materials Ltd. using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like NEO Battery Materials Ltd. or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the PE Ratio?
How can you use the PE Ratio?
What is NEO Battery Materials Ltd.'s PE Ratio?
How is the PE Ratio calculated for NEO Battery Materials Ltd. (NBM.V)?
What is the highest PE Ratio for NEO Battery Materials Ltd. (NBM.V)?
What is the 3-year average PE Ratio for NEO Battery Materials Ltd. (NBM.V)?
What is the 5-year average PE Ratio for NEO Battery Materials Ltd. (NBM.V)?
How does the current PE Ratio for NEO Battery Materials Ltd. (NBM.V) compare to its historical average?