LAND.L
Price:
$603.5
Market Cap:
$4.48B
At Landsec, we build and invest in buildings, spaces and partnerships to create sustainable places, connect communities and realise potential. We are one of the largest real estate companies in Europe, with a £11 billion portfolio of retail, leisure, workspace and residential hubs. Landsec is shaping a better future by leading our industry on environmental and social sustainability while delivering value for our shareholders, great experiences for our guests and positive change for our communities.[Read more]
Industry
REIT - Diversified
IPO Date
1988-07-01
Stock Exchange
LSE
Ticker
LAND.L
According to Land Securities Group plc’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current PE Ratio is -14.03. This represents a change of 151.02% compared to the average of -5.59 of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical PE Ratio of Land Securities Group plc over the last ten years is -16.31. The current -14.03 PE Ratio has changed 8.50% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), LAND.L's PE Ratio was at its highest in in the September 2017 quarter at 54.50. The PE Ratio was at its lowest in in the March 2018 quarter at -23.88.
Average
-16.31
Median
-4.31
Minimum
-161.57
Maximum
69.41
Discovering the peaks and valleys of Land Securities Group plc PE Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 1.04%
Maximum Annual PE Ratio = 69.41
Minimum Annual Increase = -332.78%
Minimum Annual PE Ratio = -161.57
Year | PE Ratio | Change |
---|---|---|
2024 | -14.81 | 99.40% |
2023 | -7.43 | -211.01% |
2022 | 6.69 | -282.48% |
2021 | -3.67 | -25.97% |
2020 | -4.95 | -91.26% |
2019 | -56.67 | -64.92% |
2018 | -161.57 | -332.78% |
2017 | 69.41 | 1.04% |
2016 | 6.09 | 58.80% |
2015 | 3.84 | -42.94% |
The current PE Ratio of Land Securities Group plc (LAND.L) is less than than its 3-year, less than than its 5-year, and greater than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
-5.18
5-year avg
-4.83
10-year avg
-16.31
Land Securities Group plc’s PE Ratio is less than British Land Company Plc (4.32), greater than Hammerson plc (-53.45), greater than SEGRO Plc (-1028.24), less than Pearson plc (17.89), less than Schroders plc (15.87),
Company | PE Ratio | Market cap |
---|---|---|
4.32 | $3.97B | |
-53.45 | $1.45B | |
-1028.24 | $10.62B | |
17.89 | $7.85B | |
15.87 | $5.68B |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like Land Securities Group plc using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like Land Securities Group plc or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the PE Ratio?
How can you use the PE Ratio?
What is Land Securities Group plc's PE Ratio?
How is the PE Ratio calculated for Land Securities Group plc (LAND.L)?
What is the highest PE Ratio for Land Securities Group plc (LAND.L)?
What is the 3-year average PE Ratio for Land Securities Group plc (LAND.L)?
What is the 5-year average PE Ratio for Land Securities Group plc (LAND.L)?
How does the current PE Ratio for Land Securities Group plc (LAND.L) compare to its historical average?