KDSI.JK
Price:
$480
Market Cap:
$777.60B
PT Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk manufactures and sells enamel products in Indonesia and internationally. The company offers enamel houseware, corrugated carton boxes, egg tray boxes, and other products. It also exports its products. The company was founded in 1965 and is headquartered in Surabaya, Indonesia. PT Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk is a subsidiary of PT Kitasubur Utama.[Read more]
Industry
Packaging & Containers
IPO Date
2000-06-20
Stock Exchange
JKT
Ticker
KDSI.JK
According to PT Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current PE Ratio is 2.68. This represents a change of -55.79% compared to the average of 6.06 of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical PE Ratio of PT Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk over the last ten years is 1.40. The current 2.68 PE Ratio has changed 19.11% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), KDSI.JK's PE Ratio was at its highest in in the December 2023 quarter at 17.66. The PE Ratio was at its lowest in in the March 2015 quarter at -6.26.
Average
1.40
Median
1.46
Minimum
0.75
Maximum
2.22
Discovering the peaks and valleys of PT Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk PE Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 109.00%
Maximum Annual PE Ratio = 2.22
Minimum Annual Increase = -55.40%
Minimum Annual PE Ratio = 0.75
Year | PE Ratio | Change |
---|---|---|
2023 | 2.22 | 44.99% |
2022 | 1.53 | -4.36% |
2021 | 1.60 | 15.18% |
2020 | 1.39 | -24.90% |
2019 | 1.85 | 40.13% |
2018 | 1.32 | 63.35% |
2017 | 0.81 | 7.38% |
2016 | 0.75 | -55.40% |
2015 | 1.69 | 109.00% |
2014 | 0.81 | -16.86% |
The current PE Ratio of PT Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk (KDSI.JK) is greater than its 3-year, greater than its 5-year, and greater than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
1.78
5-year avg
1.72
10-year avg
1.40
PT Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk’s PE Ratio is greater than PT Kedaung Indah Can Tbk (-6.21), greater than PT Langgeng Makmur Industri Tbk (-3.32), less than PT Kabelindo Murni Tbk (4.96), greater than PT Mustika Ratu Tbk (-10.65), less than PT Champion Pacific Indonesia Tbk (9.26),
Company | PE Ratio | Market cap |
---|---|---|
-6.21 | $34.50B | |
-3.32 | $101.86B | |
4.96 | $351.68B | |
-10.65 | $148.94B | |
9.26 | $473.11B |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like PT Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like PT Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the PE Ratio?
How can you use the PE Ratio?
What is PT Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk's PE Ratio?
How is the PE Ratio calculated for PT Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk (KDSI.JK)?
What is the highest PE Ratio for PT Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk (KDSI.JK)?
What is the 3-year average PE Ratio for PT Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk (KDSI.JK)?
What is the 5-year average PE Ratio for PT Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk (KDSI.JK)?
How does the current PE Ratio for PT Kedawung Setia Industrial Tbk (KDSI.JK) compare to its historical average?