EM.MI
Price:
$0.932
Market Cap:
$151.76M
Emak S.p.A., together with its subsidiaries, develops, manufactures, and markets various products in the outdoor power equipment, pumps and high pressure water jetting, and components and accessories business areas. The company offers brush cutters, lawnmowers, garden tractors, chainsaws, tillers, motor hoes, and walking tractors for gardening, forestry, and agricultural activities under the Oleo-Mac, Efco, Bertolini, Nibbi, and Staub brands. It also provides centrifugal pumps, diaphragm pumps, piston pumps, and components for applications on spraying and weeding machines; low, high, and very high pressure piston pumps, hydrodynamic units, and accessories for water blasting and machines for ...[Read more]
Industry
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
IPO Date
1998-07-17
Stock Exchange
MIL
Ticker
EM.MI
According to Emak S.p.A.’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current PE Ratio is 13.31. This represents a change of -23.60% compared to the average of 17.42 of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical PE Ratio of Emak S.p.A. over the last ten years is 10.62. The current 13.31 PE Ratio has changed 12.43% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), EM.MI's PE Ratio was at its highest in in the December 2017 quarter at 87.74. The PE Ratio was at its lowest in in the September 2017 quarter at -203.92.
Average
10.62
Median
10.04
Minimum
6.30
Maximum
14.72
Discovering the peaks and valleys of Emak S.p.A. PE Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 74.03%
Maximum Annual PE Ratio = 14.72
Minimum Annual Increase = -44.44%
Minimum Annual PE Ratio = 6.30
Year | PE Ratio | Change |
---|---|---|
2023 | 9.43 | 49.70% |
2022 | 6.30 | -40.79% |
2021 | 10.64 | 14.36% |
2020 | 9.30 | -19.22% |
2019 | 11.52 | 40.84% |
2018 | 8.18 | -44.44% |
2017 | 14.72 | 74.03% |
2016 | 8.46 | -40.54% |
2015 | 14.23 | 5.93% |
2014 | 13.43 | 3.41% |
The current PE Ratio of Emak S.p.A. (EM.MI) is greater than its 3-year, greater than its 5-year, and greater than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
8.79
5-year avg
9.44
10-year avg
10.62
Emak S.p.A.’s PE Ratio is greater than Biesse S.p.A. (-124.71), greater than Gefran S.p.A. (11.18), greater than EL.En. S.p.A. (12.84), less than Esprinet S.p.A. (15.13), less than Cembre S.p.A. (16.94),
Company | PE Ratio | Market cap |
---|---|---|
-124.71 | $200.04M | |
11.18 | $127.53M | |
12.84 | $806.81M | |
15.13 | $276.88M | |
16.94 | $639.98M |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like Emak S.p.A. using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like Emak S.p.A. or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the PE Ratio?
How can you use the PE Ratio?
What is Emak S.p.A.'s PE Ratio?
How is the PE Ratio calculated for Emak S.p.A. (EM.MI)?
What is the highest PE Ratio for Emak S.p.A. (EM.MI)?
What is the 3-year average PE Ratio for Emak S.p.A. (EM.MI)?
What is the 5-year average PE Ratio for Emak S.p.A. (EM.MI)?
How does the current PE Ratio for Emak S.p.A. (EM.MI) compare to its historical average?