PMMCF
Price:
$0.1534
Market Cap:
$17.83M
Pampa Metals Corporation, a mineral exploration company, engages in the acquisition and exploration of base and precious metals projects in Chile. The company explores for copper, silver, and gold deposits. It owns 100% interests in 8 projects covering an area of 60,000 hectares located in Chile. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.[Read more]
Industry
Industrial Materials
IPO Date
2018-08-24
Stock Exchange
PNK
Ticker
PMMCF
According to Pampa Metals Corporation’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current Enterprise Value is 15.07M. This represents a change of 60.62% compared to the average of 9.38M of the last 4 quarters.
The mean historical Enterprise Value of Pampa Metals Corporation over the last ten years is 6.05M. The current 15.07M Enterprise Value has changed 24.81% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), PMMCF's Enterprise Value was at its highest in in the June 2021 quarter at 62.23M. The Enterprise Value was at its lowest in in the December 2016 quarter at -1785867.00.
Average
6.05M
Median
3.64M
Minimum
-567623.24
Maximum
19.78M
Discovering the peaks and valleys of Pampa Metals Corporation Enterprise Value, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.
Maximum Annual Increase = 63.00%
Maximum Annual Enterprise Value = 19.78M
Minimum Annual Increase = -3249.49%
Minimum Annual Enterprise Value = -567623.24
Year | Enterprise Value | Change |
---|---|---|
2023 | 3.84M | -33.71% |
2022 | 5.80M | -48.31% |
2021 | 11.22M | -2075.81% |
2020 | -567623.24 | -3249.49% |
2019 | 18.02K | -99.40% |
2018 | 3.02M | 63.00% |
2017 | 1.85M | -46.09% |
2016 | 3.44M | -71.55% |
2015 | 12.09M | -38.89% |
2014 | 19.78M | -52.88% |
The current Enterprise Value of Pampa Metals Corporation (PMMCF) is greater than its 3-year, greater than its 5-year, and greater than its 10-year historical averages
3-year avg
6.95M
5-year avg
4.06M
10-year avg
6.05M
Pampa Metals Corporation’s Enterprise Value is less than Surge Battery Metals Inc. (59.76M), greater than United Royale Holdings Corp. (30.21K), less than Hillcrest Energy Technologies Ltd. (18.37M), greater than Star Alliance International Corp. (1.30M), greater than Scotch Creek Ventures Inc. (557.17K),
Company | Enterprise Value | Market cap |
---|---|---|
59.76M | $46.18M | |
30.21K | $30.21K | |
18.37M | $13.13M | |
1.30M | $588.90K | |
557.17K | $412.63K |
One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like Pampa Metals Corporation using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.
The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:
Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.
Get your free trial here.
The easiest way to analyze a company like Pampa Metals Corporation or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.
Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.
Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.
What is the Enterprise Value?
How can you use the Enterprise Value?
What is Pampa Metals Corporation's Enterprise Value?
What is the highest Enterprise Value for Pampa Metals Corporation (PMMCF)?
What is the 3-year average Enterprise Value for Pampa Metals Corporation (PMMCF)?
What is the 5-year average Enterprise Value for Pampa Metals Corporation (PMMCF)?
How does the current Enterprise Value for Pampa Metals Corporation (PMMCF) compare to its historical average?