BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc.

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc.verified

MUC

Price:

$11.04

Market Cap:

$1.04B

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. is a closed ended fixed income mutual fund launched by BlackRock, Inc. It is managed by BlackRock Advisors, LLC. The fund invests in fixed income markets. It invests primarily in a portfolio of long-term investment-grade municipal obligations, the interest on which is exempt from Federal and California income taxes. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. was formed in 1997 and is domiciled in United States.[Read more]

Industry

Asset Management

IPO Date

1998-03-02

Stock Exchange

NYSE

Ticker

MUC

The PE Ratio as of November 2024 (TTM) for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. (MUC) is 25.67

According to BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc.’s latest financial reports and current stock price. The company's current PE Ratio is 25.67. This represents a change of -11.85% compared to the average of 29.12 of the last 4 quarters.

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. (MUC) Historical PE Ratio (quarterly & annually)

How has MUC PE Ratio performed in the past?

The mean historical PE Ratio of BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. over the last ten years is 8.34. The current 25.67 PE Ratio has changed 30.68% with respect to the historical average. Over the past ten years (40 quarters), MUC's PE Ratio was at its highest in in the October 2017 quarter at 182.77. The PE Ratio was at its lowest in in the April 2015 quarter at -61.21.

Quarterly (TTM)
Annual

Average

8.34

Median

15.47

Minimum

-60.46

Maximum

76.88

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. (MUC) PE Ratio by Quarter and Year

Discovering the peaks and valleys of BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. PE Ratio, unveiling quarterly and yearly fluctuations to gain insights into the company’s financial performance and market dynamics, offering valuable data for investors and analysts alike.

Maximum Annual Increase = 418.01%

Maximum Annual PE Ratio = 76.88

Minimum Annual Increase = -496.53%

Minimum Annual PE Ratio = -60.46

Quarterly (TTM)
Annual
YearPE RatioChange
202427.61-179.65%
2023-34.66418.01%
2022-6.69-136.14%
202118.5118.00%
202015.6923.03%
201912.75-83.41%
201876.88-227.16%
2017-60.46-496.53%
201615.25-17.71%
201518.53185.64%

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. (MUC) Average PE Ratio

How has MUC PE Ratio performed in the past?

The current PE Ratio of BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. (MUC) is greater than its 3-year, greater than its 5-year, and greater than its 10-year historical averages

3-year avg

-4.58

5-year avg

4.09

10-year avg

8.34

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. (MUC) PE Ratio vs. Peers

How is MUC’s PE Ratio compared to its peers?

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc.’s PE Ratio is greater than Western Asset Investment Grade Income Fund Inc. (16.16), greater than Invesco California Value Municipal Income Trust (5.02), greater than Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income Fund (13.55), greater than Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund (5.85), greater than BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund, Inc. (-52.08), greater than BlackRock MuniVest Fund II, Inc. (-82.29), greater than BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund II, Inc. (-89.35), greater than BlackRock MuniVest Fund, Inc. (15.79), less than BlackRock Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (349.22), greater than BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II, Inc. (16.54), less than DWS Municipal Income Trust (27.36), greater than Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (7.72), greater than Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (14.82), greater than PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund III (15.80), greater than BlackRock MuniYield Fund, Inc. (-93.16), greater than BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund, Inc. (-102.55), greater than BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc. (19.50),

Build a custom stock screener for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. (MUC) and other stocks

One of the best ways to find valuable stocks to invest in is to build a custom made screener in your Excel or Google Sheets spreadsheet. This allows you to compare thousands of companies like BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. using the financials and key metrics that matter to you in a single view.

The easiest way to set this up is to use the Wisesheets add-on and set your spreadsheet like this:

Custom stock screener in Wisesheets

Covering all these metrics from financial, data, dividend data, key metrics and more you can get all the data you want for over 50+ exchanges worldwide.

Get your free trial here.

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. (MUC) and other stocks custom spreadsheet templates

The easiest way to analyze a company like BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. or any others is to create a spreadsheet model that automatically retrieves all of the stock data you need.

Using Wisesheets you can set up a spreadsheet model like this with simple spreadsheet formulas. If you change the ticker you can get all of the data automatically updated for you.

Custom stock templates in Wisesheets

Whether you need live data, historical price data, financials, dividend data, key metrics, analyst estimates, or anything else...Wisesheets has you covered.

Frequently asked questions❓

What is the PE Ratio?

How can you use the PE Ratio?

What is BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc.'s PE Ratio?

How is the PE Ratio calculated for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. (MUC)?

What is the highest PE Ratio for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. (MUC)?

What is the 3-year average PE Ratio for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. (MUC)?

What is the 5-year average PE Ratio for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. (MUC)?

How does the current PE Ratio for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. (MUC) compare to its historical average?